MeshCore.create_ble builds its client, calls connect() on it, and hands
it back only on success. A connect that *raises* therefore left that
client — and the bleak link it had already opened — orphaned inside the
library with no reference we could close. Our _mc was never assigned, so
disconnect() was a no-op and the probe's _safe_disconnect closed nothing.
That is not a corner: a PIN-protected companion answers the unbonded
notify-subscribe with a GATT authentication error, and the picker's first
attempt is always PIN-less. So selecting an unbonded companion leaked the
link, Windows held it for the life of the process, and the peripheral —
still believing it had a peer — stopped advertising. The PIN dialog then
asked for a code it could no longer deliver: the retry paired at the OS
level (the bond really is created) but could not form a GATT session, and
the user was told their correct PIN belonged to something that "isn't a
MeshCore companion". Since Unpair & quit is what leaves you unbonded, the
whole thing read as unpairing having changed the PIN.
Assemble the two objects here instead. _connect_owned_ble keeps the
handle, so both failure shapes close it: a raise (closed, then re-raised)
and a None handshake (closed, then reported as "not a companion"). The
teardown is shielded — the other way in is a probe whose wait_for expired
and cancelled the handshake, where a plain await would be cancelled the
moment it suspended and abandon the very close it was called to perform.
The picker's accepted PIN now also rides on the context, so a mid-session
reconnect doesn't re-run the whole "needs a PIN" dance against a companion
we already authenticated to. Session-lifetime only; nothing reaches disk.
Tests stop naming a real companion: the addresses and pairing code are
stand-ins now, and the fakes model the class we construct rather than the
create_ble we no longer call.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jean-Pierre MartineauandClaude Opus 5
d3735c8f7b