The row `❯` points at borrowed `brand` — so the app's identity ink and
"the row you're on" were the same hue, and worse, teal/cyan is itself a
node hue: a cyan-keyed node's name vanished into its own highlight.
Give the highlight its own name. `cursor` is white on both platforms
(slot 15 on the VT, the top of the bright bank, so the row's bold cannot
promote it further and every dim-slot `not bold` pin inside a highlighted
row goes on meaning what it meant). White sits outside the per-node
spectrum, so it can never collide with an identity; it does share ink
with `you`, which is the accepted cost — spans that set their own colour
keep it over the base, so only unstyled text goes white, and only on the
row already under the reader's eye.
Every surface that draws its own cursor row follows: the select list and
its reorder mode, the feed, chat, routes and actions on the node page,
the composer, records, trace, tx, the walk, the paths screen, the prompt's
suggestions. The composer's insertion-slot chip takes the same white — its
docstring already tied it to "the colour the list cursor below it wears",
and the chip ink was already picked to stay readable on white.
Reverse-video chips keep `selected`: on the VT a reversed white lands on
the light grey the F-key lane already owns, so a white default button
would stop reading as the committing verb.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jean-Pierre MartineauandClaude Opus 5
602bceea3b