Both are catalogues, not changes. Nothing in either has been acted on;
each finding says where it is, what it does, and what makes it a question,
so the decisions can be taken one at a time instead of discovered one at
a time. Every code reference in both was machine-checked (144 of them).
The navigation survey lists every place the app does something other than
"Esc pops and you carry on". The headline is that three screens rebuild
themselves each round and lose your place — node detail loses the open tab
too, so working through the Routes list means re-opening it after every
trace — while eight others carefully restore it and four sidestep the
problem entirely by keeping one screen for the whole visit. Also: Esc
peels a live filter on three screens and abandons the whole screen on two,
which is the same keys giving opposite results on the app's most-used
list; six different spellings of the value a Back row resolves with, so
callers test three at once; and a pop-then-re-push workaround repeated
five times where the session API has a gap.
The consistency survey is mostly good news — footer hints, titles, the
lexicon, status marks and the query line all came back clean under
mechanical sweeps, which is what makes the nine remaining items worth
trusting as close to the whole list. The ones that show: four screens
whose empty state shouts in sentence case when the empty state is the only
thing on screen, a dialog with no Cancel whose default lands on an action
and whose rightmost button is the destructive one, and two full screens —
Trace among them — that never had a PicoCalc lane pass and so advertise
pager chips that do nothing.
Jean-Pierre Martineau
bfd396da69