Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jean-Pierre MartineauandClaude Opus 5 59eccba0a0 Every build runs on 3.14
JP builds with 3.14 now, so the workflows do too. The lint job moves from 3.10, the
packaging build job and the release's site rebuild and PyPI build from 3.12, and the
installers from 3.10. The test matrix is untouched: it still runs every version from
3.10 up, because 3.10 is still the floor.

The installers' comment said the oldest Python was chosen on purpose, for reach. The
reach that matters on Linux comes from glibc, and that comes from the runner, so the
Linux legs stay on ubuntu-22.04 and the comment now says that. The binaries carry 3.14
from the next release; 0.9.0's were built on 3.10.

The changelog gains the 3.14 entry JP wrote in another session, plus a line for the
downloads.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 21:14:52 -04:00
Jean-Pierre MartineauandClaude Opus 5 117b958edf Everything PyPI needs, and no way to reach it by accident
The distribution is named `mesh-term`, because `meshterm` is on PyPI's prohibited
list and a request to free it is 319 deep in a queue. The name after
`pip install` is the only thing that changes: the import package is still
`meshterm`, the console script is still `meshterm`, and nothing in the code reads
the distribution name, so this is one line rather than a rename. Proven rather
than assumed — the wheel was built, installed into a clean interpreter, and the
command run from outside the source tree.

The rest is what a stranger sees on a package page and what the app never shows
them: project URLs, trove classifiers for the console, the three operating
systems and the four Python versions, and the licence moved to its PEP 639
expression form. No `License ::` classifier, which that form forbids, and no
`Typing :: Typed` either — there is no `py.typed` marker, and a classifier that
claims something untrue is worse than an absent one.

`release.yml` publishes to PyPI and is built to be hard to fire. It has no
`push: tags` trigger, and that absence is the design: a workflow that published
on a `v*` tag would make tagging v0.9.0 on launch day claim a name on a public
index, permanently, as a side effect of an unrelated action — and PyPI has no
rename and no real delete. So a human runs it from the Actions tab and types the
version, the job compares that against the version the tree actually built and
refuses on a mismatch, and a `pypi` environment can hold it for a reviewer.
Trusted Publishing means there is no API token in the repository to leak. It
publishes whatever version is committed; there is no version argument, so it
cannot publish something other than what is there.

CI gains a packaging job that does the same build and clean-install check on every
push, publishing nothing. Packaging breaks quietly, and the alternative is finding
out on the one day that is worst for finding out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-07 04:00:56 -04:00